"Atheists have continued to predictably wax philosophical concerning their intellectually self-sufficient certainties of God's nonexistence. However, the ease of their perilously lazy cynicism will become increasingly thorny as they age and are forced to acknowledge that their previously chosen stance as atheists must, as a matter of course, empirically and ultimately bear out that they were neither overly intellectual nor self-sufficient; neither unpredictable in opinion nor genuinely philosophic to originality; neither competent in certainties nor cerebrally capable of explaining creation without stumbling over the necessity of a Creator; neither convicted atheists excluded from eternal questions nor naturalists undaunted by morose preoccupations for ethereal answers; and lastly, neither authentically acceptant of a life without end nor having ever been secure in trusting their facts based on science in lieu of who or what made their science possible." -B.G. Jett
What facts?
I just want one agnostic or "Atheist" as none truly exist to, with reason, undo their argument by asserting even a portion of the aforementioned axiom penned for fun as completely false. Indeed, it is either false or not. If there cannot be one truth, than there reasonably cannot be any truth. What, therein, is false or wrong if anything? Why do atheists do and say things that surely seem marginally if not considerably correct and suggestive of being a human being with a conscience? How can this be explained away? Learned behavior from apes? I don't wish to be discordant, but I simply am asking for (as are many atheist if honest with said position, if atheist) an intellectual, reasonable, and orginal positing of information and even possibly compelling conviction as to why God or one God cannot and does not exist?
It is not just a "Christian" who must be mandated to produce apologetics.
Thank you,
Hang Tough
